Shadows of the Indian: Stereotypes in American Culture. By Raymond
William Stedman. Foreword by Rennard Strickland. Norman: University of Oklahoma
Press, 1982. Bibliography. Illustrations. Index. 281 pages. $24.95.
Reviewed by Albert L. Hurtado, Lecturer, Department of History, University of
Maryland, author of articles on Indian and White relations, the most recent
being a study of Indian and White house-holds on the California borderland
frontier in 1860, in the Western Historical Quarterly.
Raymond William Stedman wrote this book to describe and to help destroy the
false images of Indians that are so pervasive in our popular culture. In his
foreword, Rennard Strickland, a Cherokee and Osage lawyer, attaches an additional
purpose to the book: to eliminate the racist stereotypes of Indians so that
national Indian policy can "escape the baggage of the backward trap of distorted
memories" (p. xiii). Shadows of the Indian belongs to the same genre as
Roy Harvey Pearce's Savagism and Civilization (1965) and Robert F.
Berkhofer's The White Man's Indian (1978), and Stedman takes the reader
through some familiar territory. Like other authors, he traces the historical
development of Indian stereotypes. Trouble began when Columbus misnamed
Caribbean native people indios, believing that he had reached the East
Indies. The Columbian geographical error was soon remedied, but his name for
Native Americans remains with us. Through the centuries authors, playwrights,
poets, screenwriters, artists and actors have embellished the popular image of
the Indians. Stedman attacks Shakespeare, Daniel Defoe, Thomas Berger, Mark
Twain, radio scriptwriters of "The Lone Ranger," and the authors of dozens of forgettable paperback novels. He was able to find
some redeeming qualities in the work of James Fenimore Cooper, playwright J. N.
Barker (The Indian Princess; or La Belle Sauvage, 1808), and screenwriter
Michael Blankfort (Broken Arrow, 1950). Stedman discusses the well known
list of Indian stereotypes that include (but are not limited to) Indian
princesses, lusty "squaws," drunken "bucks," the "noble
savage," cruel and implacable warriors, Indian rapists who covet yellow-haired
maidens, and "half-breeds" torn between white civilization and a "
savage" heritage. His main contribution is his discussion of recent popular
fiction, films, radio and television. Indeed, in this respect, his book is a treasure
trove for trivia buffs. He recounts the predictable plots of scores of grade B films
and comments on the actors, directors and screenwriters who created them. To demonstrate
the variety of uses for Indian stereotypes, he gives an account of Sacheen
Littlefeather's appearance at the 1973 Academy Awards ceremony where she
explained why Marlon Brando was not on hand to accept his award for Best Actor.
He re-fused the Oscar, she said, because of Hollywood's record of portraying Indians
in an unfavorable light. Few thoughtful listeners could have disagreed with that
judgment, but the Academy did not appreciate having their trophy spurned and the
crowd tried to shout down Brando's Indian princess surrogate. Stedman hints
that Brando used Littlefeather's Indian princess image to gain sympathy for his
decision and to deflect public anger. He asks rhetorically, "Did Marlon Brando,
when he let the body of that lovely lass in her long braids shield him from the
blows of a hostile audience, choose the most irresistible of all Indian
images?" (p. 31). The reader is left to wonder about Brando's motivations.
Stedman likewise presents a detailed examination of the paperback novels with
Indian characters which appeared in the 1950s and 60s. Not only does he analyze
personalities who appear in the text, he describes the images that appeared on
the covers. The plots were often thinly veiled devices which used male and
female Indian stereotypes as titillating sexual objects. All of this shows that
stereotypes of Indians remain persistent in the popular culture of white
America. For those who are not able to recognize dehumanizing stereotypes on
their own, Stedman provides a few guidelines for readers and viewers who should
ask: Is the vocabulary demeaning? Do the Indians talk like Tonto? Do the Indians
belong to the feather-bonnet tribe? Are comic interludes built upon firewater
and stupidity? Are the Indians portrayed as an extinct species? Are the Indians
either noble or savage? Is the tone patronizing? Is Indian humanness recognized?
These questions seem obvious and con-descending, but Shadows of the
Indians shows that the persistence of demeaning Indian stereotypes is a continuing
problem that demands the attention of everyone who writes and reads about Indian
people. We should do away with these racist images. Will Sampson, an Indian
actor portraying a television sheriff, put it best when he finally tired of the
Lone Ranger-Tonto jokes of his white deputy. "Hey . . . Buck," he sighed.
"That's enough . . . NO more."