The Journal of San Diego History
SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY QUARTERLY
Winter 1976, Volume 22, Number 1
James E. Moss, Editor
The Imperial Valley in 1904
Edited by Peter W. van der Pas
W. O. Hendricks, in his article entitled "Developing San Diego's Desert Empire" published in the Journal of San Diego History, Summer, 1971, discussed the history of the Imperial Valley from the time California became a state until about 1907 and dealt mainly with the organizational aspects of the reclamation of the Colorado Desert. R. L. Sperry's article, "When The Imperial Valley Fought For Its Life," published in the Journal, Winter, 1975, covered the engineering works constructed to bring water into the valley and the subsequent difficulties experienced with those works.
The Imperial Valley as it was at an early stage of its settlement in 1904 was described by the Dutch botanist Hugo de Vries who also wrote an account of his visit to San Diego in 1906, published in this Journal, Summer, 1971, with Hendricks' article. De Vries looked at the valley through the eyes of a botanist and agriculturist and was especially interested in the desert as it was before settlement had taken place. It is a view that is different from that of Hendricks and Sperry and therefore serves as a supplement to their articles. For a brief biographical sketch of de Vries, see his 1906 account of San Diego mentioned above.
Until the end of World War II, the Dutch in general did not travel much. Most of them spent their vacations in a pension or in a residential hotel near a forested area or near the beach, or they simply stayed home. Travel to foreign countries was relatively rare and if a trip abroad was taken, neighboring countries were favored, Belgium, Germany (the Rhine!), France, Switzerland, perhaps Italy or Austria. England was much less visited, the United States only rarely.
The lesser popularity of English speaking countries was perhaps caused by the unfavorable rate of exchange, to which for the United States the lengthy and costly ocean crossing must be added. Around the year 1900, the trip from Rotterdam to New York took ten days; about three weeks of ocean travel for a round trip. This alone would exclude a vacation trip to the United States.
Trips to the United States by Dutch people, and this is probably true for other continental European countries as well, were mainly made for business reasons or for study. As a consequence, there was little first hand information about the United States. The newspapers did not have much information; what they reported was mainly the more sensational news which contributed little toward knowing and understanding the country, but which added to the aura of mystery which surrounded it.
This explains why so many travelers to the United States put down their impressions in a book or in a magazine article and why such publications found avid readers. Hugo de Vries' account of his first journey to the United States went through two editions (1905, 1906); the travel account of another Dutch botanist, ). P. Lotsy, was also published two times (1924, 1930).
Until the year 1890, de Vries' research had been in the field of plant physiology. Around 1890 he completely and quite suddenly changed the field of his researches to the sturdy of phenomena of variation and heredity in plants from all conceivable angles. Around 1896, he discovered the laws of heredity which are now called Mendel's laws. The priest Gregor Johann Mendel had discovered these laws earlier and published them in a paper in 1865. When de Vries discovered these laws, without knowing of Mendel's work, he did not publish immediately; he wanted to save them for a large book on heredity he was planning to publish later. However, around 1900, there were indications in the professional literature that others were on the same track. Therefore de Vries decided to publish his findings simultaneously in French and German journals. His suspicion that others were obtaining similar results in their experimentations proved to be true. Before the year had ended, two other investigators published their results, the German botanist Carl Correns and the Austrian agriculturist Erik Tschermak. This discovery and especially the fact that it was claimed by three investigators almost simultaneously, caused great excitement in the botanical world. It especially focused attention on de Vries. Up to that time, de Vries was quite well known in Europe as a plant physiologist, but unknown in the United States where plant physiology was little studied. There was, however, a great interest in hybridization in the United States De Vries' rediscovery of Mendel's laws and the publication during 1901-03 of his large book, The Mutation Theory, which he had been planning for ten years, made his name known across the ocean and led to invitations to lecture at the Summer School in Berkeley in 1904 and 1906.
The rediscovery of Mendel's laws of heredity led to a frantic activity in this field by botanists of many nations, an activity in which de Vries hardly participated. He was not very much interested in unraveling the secrets of heredity. He was interested in the explanation of evolution. He wanted to know how a species originated, and he believed that a discovery he had made before the rediscovery of Mendel's laws, the mutation of plants, would lead to an answer to such questions. Mendel's laws predicted how the characteristics of a "father" and a "mother" plant were distributed over their progeny. Hence de Vries reasoned that a Mendelian crossing only redistributed already existing characters and thus could not create a new species which required the rise of entirely new characteristics. When he found plants producing offspring which differed markedly from both the father and the mother plant, he decided that such plants had to be considered new species according to the accepted views of taxonomy of the time. Especially one plant genus, Oenothera, showed this mutation phenomenon markedly, and de Vries made intensive studies of its genus.
With the publication of his book, The Mutation Theory, de Vries considered his research on these subjects closed and started to look for a new field of activity. It had long been known that plants which grow under difficult circumstances, for example in deserts, have special ways to adapt themselves to their adverse environment. These plants must have developed their ability to adapt in a gradual way by small evolutionary steps. De Vries planned to take the adaptation of plants to a hostile environment as his next research project, hence his interest in desert plants. During his American trips of 1904 and 1906, de Vries visited the deserts and badlands as much as possible. On his trip of 1904, he studied the desert of Arizona, visited the Desert Laboratory in Tucson, the Colorado desert and the alkali lands near Monterey and Fresno. On his trip of 1906, he visited the desert of Arizona again, the deserts near Salt Lake City and the dunes near the shore of Lake Michigan.
Prior to his first visit to the United States, de Vries made extensive studies to decide what he wanted to see and where he could learn most. He questioned his colleagues at the University of Amsterdam and borrowed numerous books on American subjects. His account of his visit to Imperial Valley starts with a discussion of the geological history of the Colorado River and the Salton Basin. This information he probably owed to the geology professor A. C. Lawson of Berkeley. He devoted only a few lines to the story of the engineering works which brought the water of the Colorado river into the Valley. Apparently he did not quite understand this subject, which is, as Sperry's article shows, rather complicated. The most interesting part of his account is the description of his walk along one of the irrigation canals and into the desert. His discussion of the desert flora gives a vivid impression of the desolation of the land which was being reclaimed. The account ends with some remarks on the irrigation system itself and on the founding of new cities. The latter subject fascinated him; elsewhere in his book he describes how the development of cities in California could be watched from the train, starting with a whistlestop without signs of habitation, elsewhere streets laid out but with no houses as yet, and so on, and finally a fully developed city such as San Francisco at the end of the evolutionary scale.
When Hugo de Vries visited Imperial Valley, he apparently was unaware of the fact that the water supply had been maintained only by means of special measures. This was true for the years 1902, 1903 and 1904. These measures were one of the causes which contributed to the disaster of 1905. In that year there were, during the months of February through August, six unusually high floods in the Colorado River. The last one of these diverted the course of the River from its current bed, leading into the Gulf of California, back into its old bed, leading into the Imperial Valley. The waters of the river raced into the Imperial Valley and started filling up Salton Sink which again was changed into a lake and greatly increased in area. The bottom of the Sink was 287 feet below sea level in 1904; at the present time the water level of what is now called the Salton Sea is 244 feet below sea level, a difference of 43 feet. At the height of the disaster, the difference was 83 feet. The flooding of the valley repeated itself in 1906.38
The Colorado Development Company had already expended most of its working capital on efforts to supply water to the Valley during the years 1902-1904 and was totally unable to cope with this disaster. The Company was taken over ultimately by the Southern Pacific Railroad which, with its abundance of resources, personnel and engineering talent, finally managed to lead the river back into its old bed on February 11, 1907.
When de Vries returned to the United States in the spring of 1906, the disaster situation was at its height. He was very much interested in this event and planned to visit Imperial Valley again. The Southern Pacific Railroad had given him free train tickets, however his schedule was too crowded. He never saw the Imperial Desert again.
1. Usually simply called milo, it is an annual grain sorghum introduced into South Carolina about 1880, probably from Africa, and belongs to the genus Andropogon. Maize, or corn, belongs to the Genus Zea.
2. In Holland the word hour is often loosely used to indicate distance; one hour walking or five kilometers (about 3.5 miles).
3. Here the Rio Grande is probably meant. The Green River is a tributary to the Colorado River, but the Rio Grande flows directly into the Gulf of Mexico.
4. This does not make sense. De Vries probably meant that the river carries in spring as much water per hour as at other times it carries per day.
5. A bunder is an old dutch measure of area, equalling 2.471 acres. De Vries used the word mistakenly instead of acre.
6. 100 meters equal 328 feet; the Lippincott map shows 287 feet.
7. The Mexican Company was the Sociedad de Irrigacion y Terrenos de la Baja California. The Imperial Land Company, according to Hendricks' article, was the California Development Company. (See Bibliography).
8. Identified on the Lippincott map as the Alamo River.
9. Not named on the Lippincott map, but so named on various other maps.
10. This was Imperial.
11. The saltbushes are Atriplex genus, the sage brushes are Artemisia genus (Sunflower family).
12. Quailbrush or Lenscale.
13. Cattle spinach or Allscale. The name Shrub saltbush does not occur in the floras of Jaeger, Munz, Jepson or the California Geological Survey (see Bibliography).
14. Jaeger uses the common name narrow-leaved wingscale, while Jepson calls them shadscale.
15. Sodium chloride and sodium sulfate.
16. This Spanish word is spelled with double "r." The desert mesquite is Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa.
17. Jaeger, in The California Deserts, writes "The leopard lizard (Crotaphytus wislisenii) is a denizen of the broad stretches of the sandy mesas and washes of the open desert. In spite of its large body it is capable of great speed and if caught in disadvantageous positions is able to give its pursuer a merry and prolonged chase before being taken. The hotter the day the more interesting and racy the pursuit... The silverwinged grasshopper (Bootettix argentatus), singing in the creosote bushes, is often snatched from its perch by a leaping Crotaphytus, which may have jumped three times its own length to get it."
18. Jaeger and Munz identify them as Larrea divaricata.
19. Ribus rubrum.
20. A gall which is found on roses, Cypnis species. The gall seen by de Vries was Asphondylia auripila.
21. De Vries has the dutch word ster-kers here. However, no dutch flora has this name. He must have meant kruid-kers, Lepidium genus, of which several species grow wild in Holland.
22. De Vries mistakenly writes "Arrow-root." It is buckthorn (Alnus).
23. The three Baccharis species mentioned by Jaeger all have whitish or yellowish leaves.
24. Actually Sesuvium verrucosum or S. sessile. The English name is Lowland purslane.
25. Leptochloa uninerva.
26. Sedges.
27. Galingale.
28. Probably Xanthium spinosum, Spiny cocklebur.
29. Atriplex genus.
30. Actually Chenopodium, pig-weed.
31. Sonchus species.
32. Typha latifolia and T. angustifolia.
33. De Vries means New River.
34. The name of this place must have been changed shortly after de Vries visited. It is called Old Beach on the map which illustrates Sperry's article, Imperial Junction on Lippincott's map and Niland on modern maps.
35. Actually Washingtonia filifera.
36. About 230-260 feet above sea level. This does not check at all, Imperial Junction lies about 120 feet below sea level.
37. Identified on the Lippincott map as Holtville.
38. The story of what can only be called the inadequacy of the engineering works is told in Sperry's article, where also are accounts of the disasters of 1905 and 1906 and the efforts of the Southern Pacific Railroad which finally brought the river under control again (See Bibliography).
W. H. Brewer, Sereno Watson and Asa Gray, Geological Survey of California: Botany, Vols. I and II Cambridge, Mass.: J. Wilson & Son, 1880.
W. O. Hendricks, "Developing San Diego's Desert Empire." Journal of San Diego History, XVII, 3 (Summer, 1971), 1-11.
J. Huizinga, Mensch en Menigte in Amerika, vier Essays over moderne Beschavingsgeschiedenis. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink, 1918. Reprinted 1920, 1928. Also published in Verzamelde Werken, Vol. V, pp. 249-417.
J. Huizinga, Amerika, levend en denkend. Losse opmerkingen. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink, 1927. Also published in Verzamelde Werken, Vol. V, pp. 418-489.
E. C. Jaeger, The California Deserts, A Visitor's Handbook. Fifth ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1948.
E. C. Jaeger, Desert Wildflowers. Seventh ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
W. L. Jepson, A Manual of the Flowering Plants of California. Berkeley: Sather Gate Bookshop, 1925.
J. P. Lotsy, Van den Atlantischen Oceaan naar de Stille Zuidzee. Gravenhage: G. Naeff, 1923. Second ed., 1930.
P. A. Munz, A Manual of Southern California Botany. Claremont: Claremont Colleges, 1935.
P. W. van der Pas, "Hugo de Vries visits San Diego: A Famous Botanist Views The City At The Turn Of The Century." Journal of San Diego History, XVII, 3 (Summer, 1971), 13-23.
R. L. Sperry, "When the Imperial Valley Fought For Its Life." Journal of San Diego History, XXII, 1 (Winter, 1975), 1-25.
H. de Vries, Naar Californie, Reisherinneringen. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink, 1905. Reprinted 1906.
H. de Vries, Naar Californie II, Reisherinneringen. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink, 1907.
Peter W. van der Pas, who holds a degree in physics from the Institute of Technology, Delft, Holland, has contributed papers on subjects in the history of science to various journals such as Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, Janus, Scientiarium Historia and to the International Congresses for the History of Science in Ithaca (1962) and Paris (1968). He edited and translated an article entitled "Hugo De Vries Visits San Diego: A Famous Botanist Views the City at the Turn of the Century," which appeared in this journal in the Summer, 1971, issue.
Illustrations from H. de Vries, Naar Californie, Reisherinnerigen. Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink, 1905.









